Ethiopia PDR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Asses — Stocks

Ethiopia PDR
5.20 million An
in 1992
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
23.98 million An
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
4th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Asses — Stocks over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 23.98 million An against 5.20 million An in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 18.78 million An.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.6 times Ethiopia PDR's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 120 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 3.76 million An 3.28 million An 476,554 An Ethiopia PDR
1970s 3.86 million An 4.25 million An 392,290 An Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 4.42 million An 4.52 million An 105,089 An Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 5.10 million An 4.22 million An 881,547 An Ethiopia PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — stocks, Ethiopia PDR or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 23.98 million An against 5.20 million An in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — stocks between Ethiopia PDR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
18.78 million An, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for asses — stocks?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-2/ethiopia-pdr/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-2/ethiopia-pdr/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Ethiopia PDR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
165 places, 9,444 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).