Australia and New Zealand vs Barbados: Asses — Stocks

Australia and New Zealand
934.5 LSU
in 2023
Barbados
1,074 LSU
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
96th
Barbados rank
93rd

Asses — Stocks over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Barbados
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 1,074 LSU against 934.5 LSU in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 139.5 LSU.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 96th and Barbados ranks 93rd of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Barbados in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Barbados Difference Ahead
1960s 2,500 LSU 1,000 LSU 1,500 LSU Australia and New Zealand
1970s 2,490 LSU 1,000 LSU 1,490 LSU Australia and New Zealand
1980s 1,849 LSU 1,000 LSU 848.85 LSU Australia and New Zealand
1990s 1,138 LSU 1,000 LSU 138.2 LSU Australia and New Zealand
2000s 1,000 LSU 1,088 LSU 87.5 LSU Barbados
2010s 974.85 LSU 1,127 LSU 152.35 LSU Barbados
2020s 938.25 LSU 1,082 LSU 144 LSU Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Barbados?
Barbados, at 1,074 LSU against 934.5 LSU in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Barbados?
139.5 LSU, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Barbados?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Barbados rank globally for asses — stocks?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 96th and Barbados ranks 93rd of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Barbados: Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/barbados/">Australia and New Zealand vs Barbados: Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
163 places, 9,318 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.