Belize vs Rwanda: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Belize
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 6.67 kg/ha against 6.66 kg/ha in Belize, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.63 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | 2.14 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1970s | 6.87 kg/ha | 4.16 kg/ha | 2.71 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1980s | 7.23 kg/ha | 4.81 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1990s | 7.48 kg/ha | 5.65 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2000s | 7.08 kg/ha | 5.84 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2010s | 6.69 kg/ha | 6.04 kg/ha | 0.6546 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2020s | 6.64 kg/ha | 6.3 kg/ha | 0.3421 kg/ha | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Belize or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 6.67 kg/ha against 6.66 kg/ha in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Belize and Rwanda?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Rwanda rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Belize ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).