Congo vs Guyana: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Congo
- Guyana
How they compare
Congo currently reports 7.97 kg/ha against 7.9 kg/ha in Guyana, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Congo ranks 46th and Guyana ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.35 kg/ha | 7.58 kg/ha | 4.24 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1970s | 4.08 kg/ha | 9.45 kg/ha | 5.37 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1980s | 4.44 kg/ha | 10.2 kg/ha | 5.76 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1990s | 5.31 kg/ha | 9.66 kg/ha | 4.35 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 2000s | 7.33 kg/ha | 7.83 kg/ha | 0.5049 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 2010s | 7.52 kg/ha | 7.83 kg/ha | 0.3113 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 2020s | 7.75 kg/ha | 7.92 kg/ha | 0.1648 kg/ha | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Congo or Guyana?
- Congo, at 7.97 kg/ha against 7.9 kg/ha in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Congo and Guyana?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Guyana rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Congo ranks 46th and Guyana ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).