Cuba vs Qatar: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Qatar
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 4.07 kg/ha against 4.07 kg/ha in Qatar, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 149th and Qatar ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.86 kg/ha | 0.9878 kg/ha | 0.8683 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 2.56 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 2.45 kg/ha | 2.43 kg/ha | 0.0141 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 2.93 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | 0.1862 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3.9 kg/ha | 3.11 kg/ha | 0.7925 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 3.99 kg/ha | 3.87 kg/ha | 0.122 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 4.08 kg/ha | 3.99 kg/ha | 0.0833 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cuba or Qatar?
- Cuba, at 4.07 kg/ha against 4.07 kg/ha in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cuba and Qatar?
- 0 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Qatar rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 149th and Qatar ranks 150th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).