Czechia vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Czechia
10.86 kg/ha
in 2023
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
11.83 kg/ha
in 2023
Czechia rank
26th
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank
24th

Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Czechia
  • Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
051015199320082023

How they compare

Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of currently reports 11.83 kg/ha against 10.86 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.97 kg/ha.

That makes Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 26th and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 24th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 12.41 kg/ha 11.05 kg/ha 1.37 kg/ha Czechia
2000s 12.59 kg/ha 10.78 kg/ha 1.81 kg/ha Czechia
2010s 11.82 kg/ha 11.54 kg/ha 0.2754 kg/ha Czechia
2020s 11.05 kg/ha 11.8 kg/ha 0.751 kg/ha Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Czechia or Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of, at 11.83 kg/ha against 10.86 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Czechia and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
0.97 kg/ha, with Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Czechia ranks 26th and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/atmospheric-deposition-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/czechia/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/atmospheric-deposition-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/czechia/ethiopia/">Czechia vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).