Ecuador vs Georgia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Georgia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 5.47 kg/ha against 5.35 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 115th and Georgia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.64 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | 0.1658 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 5.44 kg/ha | 5.11 kg/ha | 0.3257 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 5.52 kg/ha | 5.29 kg/ha | 0.2321 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 5.56 kg/ha | 5.26 kg/ha | 0.3035 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ecuador or Georgia?
- Ecuador, at 5.47 kg/ha against 5.35 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ecuador and Georgia?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Georgia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 115th and Georgia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).