Equatorial Guinea vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 5.02 kg/ha against 4.82 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 119th of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.92 kg/ha | 4.83 kg/ha | 0.0929 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 5.01 kg/ha | 4.82 kg/ha | 0.1874 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Equatorial Guinea or Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 5.02 kg/ha against 4.82 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).