Eritrea vs Mexico: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 4.43 kg/ha against 4.42 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mexico ahead.
Eritrea ranks 142nd and Mexico ranks 141st of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.79 kg/ha | 4.97 kg/ha | 0.185 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2000s | 4.4 kg/ha | 4.93 kg/ha | 0.5265 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2010s | 4.47 kg/ha | 4.94 kg/ha | 0.479 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2020s | 4.42 kg/ha | 4.43 kg/ha | 0.0103 kg/ha | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eritrea or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 4.43 kg/ha against 4.42 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eritrea and Mexico?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mexico?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Mexico rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 142nd and Mexico ranks 141st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).