Eritrea vs Nicaragua: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4.44 kg/ha against 4.42 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 131st and Nicaragua ranks 129th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.79 kg/ha | 3.79 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 4.4 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 0.2167 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 4.47 kg/ha | 4.37 kg/ha | 0.0901 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 4.42 kg/ha | 4.43 kg/ha | 0.0138 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eritrea or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 4.44 kg/ha against 4.42 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eritrea and Nicaragua?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Nicaragua?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Nicaragua rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 131st and Nicaragua ranks 129th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).