Georgia vs Malawi: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 5.45 kg/ha against 5.35 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 118th and Malawi ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.48 kg/ha | 4.4 kg/ha | 0.078 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 5.11 kg/ha | 5.02 kg/ha | 0.0947 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5.29 kg/ha | 5.3 kg/ha | 0.0085 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 5.26 kg/ha | 5.43 kg/ha | 0.1711 kg/ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 5.45 kg/ha against 5.35 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Malawi?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 118th and Malawi ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).