Georgia vs Tunisia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 5.35 kg/ha against 5.27 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 110th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.48 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | 0.3101 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 5.11 kg/ha | 5.24 kg/ha | 0.128 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 5.29 kg/ha | 5.23 kg/ha | 0.0561 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 5.26 kg/ha | 5.27 kg/ha | 0.0136 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Tunisia?
- Georgia, at 5.35 kg/ha against 5.27 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Tunisia?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Tunisia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 110th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).