Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 2.82 kg/ha against 2.54 kg/ha in Mauritania, a difference of 0.28 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 160th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.88 kg/ha | 2.15 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 3.18 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 0.9912 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2.99 kg/ha | 2.41 kg/ha | 0.5813 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2.86 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 0.3335 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
- Kazakhstan, at 2.82 kg/ha against 2.54 kg/ha in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
- 0.28 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 160th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).