Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2.93 kg/ha against 2.82 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 160th and New Zealand ranks 157th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.88 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 1.7 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 3.18 kg/ha | 2.47 kg/ha | 0.7028 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2.99 kg/ha | 2.86 kg/ha | 0.1317 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2.86 kg/ha | 2.84 kg/ha | 0.0233 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kazakhstan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 2.93 kg/ha against 2.82 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and New Zealand rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 160th and New Zealand ranks 157th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).