Kyrgyzstan vs Saudi Arabia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.3 kg/ha against 3.18 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 150th and Saudi Arabia ranks 153rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.32 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | 0.8954 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 2.91 kg/ha | 2.67 kg/ha | 0.2433 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 3.21 kg/ha | 3.21 kg/ha | 0.0064 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 3.28 kg/ha | 3.11 kg/ha | 0.1708 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Saudi Arabia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.3 kg/ha against 3.18 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 150th and Saudi Arabia ranks 153rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).