Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
5.86 kg/ha
in 2023
Pakistan
15.84 kg/ha
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
19th
Pakistan rank
16th

Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Pakistan
57.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 15.84 kg/ha against 5.86 kg/ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 9.98 kg/ha.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 2.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 29 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 4.26 kg/ha 4.83 kg/ha 0.5627 kg/ha Pakistan
1970s 5.23 kg/ha 5.46 kg/ha 0.2247 kg/ha Pakistan
1980s 5.91 kg/ha 7.77 kg/ha 1.86 kg/ha Pakistan
1990s 5.89 kg/ha 11.33 kg/ha 5.44 kg/ha Pakistan
2000s 5.54 kg/ha 12.7 kg/ha 7.16 kg/ha Pakistan
2010s 5.85 kg/ha 14.78 kg/ha 8.93 kg/ha Pakistan
2020s 5.87 kg/ha 15.7 kg/ha 9.83 kg/ha Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 15.84 kg/ha against 5.86 kg/ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
9.98 kg/ha, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/atmospheric-deposition-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/atmospheric-deposition-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).