Latvia vs Libya: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 4.16 kg/ha against 4.1 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 148th and Libya ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.67 kg/ha | 3.44 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.12 kg/ha | 4.12 kg/ha | 0.0028 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 4.15 kg/ha | 4.14 kg/ha | 0.0175 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 4.11 kg/ha | 4.15 kg/ha | 0.0384 kg/ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Libya?
- Libya, at 4.16 kg/ha against 4.1 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Libya?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 148th and Libya ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).