Latvia vs Madagascar: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 4.1 kg/ha against 3.9 kg/ha in Madagascar, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 148th and Madagascar ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.67 kg/ha | 2.7 kg/ha | 1.97 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.12 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | 0.6952 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4.15 kg/ha | 3.79 kg/ha | 0.3676 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 4.11 kg/ha | 3.89 kg/ha | 0.2238 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Madagascar?
- Latvia, at 4.1 kg/ha against 3.9 kg/ha in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Madagascar?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Madagascar rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 148th and Madagascar ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).