Nicaragua vs Tajikistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Nicaragua
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4.44 kg/ha against 4.25 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.19 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 129th and Tajikistan ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.67 kg/ha | 3.2 kg/ha | 0.4665 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 4.18 kg/ha | 3.63 kg/ha | 0.5554 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 4.37 kg/ha | 4.09 kg/ha | 0.2847 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 4.43 kg/ha | 4.15 kg/ha | 0.2792 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Nicaragua or Tajikistan?
- Nicaragua, at 4.44 kg/ha against 4.25 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Nicaragua and Tajikistan?
- 0.19 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Tajikistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Nicaragua ranks 129th and Tajikistan ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).