Sweden vs Uzbekistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Sweden
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 3.67 kg/ha against 3.48 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.19 kg/ha.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 146th and Uzbekistan ranks 149th of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.64 kg/ha | 3.38 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 3.76 kg/ha | 3.05 kg/ha | 0.7065 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 3.65 kg/ha | 3.36 kg/ha | 0.2925 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 3.67 kg/ha | 3.48 kg/ha | 0.1894 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Sweden or Uzbekistan?
- Sweden, at 3.67 kg/ha against 3.48 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Sweden and Uzbekistan?
- 0.19 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Uzbekistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Sweden ranks 146th and Uzbekistan ranks 149th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).