Ukraine vs Uruguay: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ukraine
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 7.41 kg/ha against 7.19 kg/ha in Ukraine, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Ukraine ranks 60th and Uruguay ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ukraine averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.89 kg/ha | 7.75 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 7.3 kg/ha | 8.19 kg/ha | 0.898 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 7.1 kg/ha | 7.73 kg/ha | 0.6358 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 7.19 kg/ha | 7.73 kg/ha | 0.5389 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ukraine or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 7.41 kg/ha against 7.19 kg/ha in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ukraine and Uruguay?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ukraine and Uruguay rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ukraine ranks 60th and Uruguay ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).