Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 9,378 t against 9,016 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 362 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Armenia ranks 90th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,169 t | 8,143 t | 973.63 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 8,591 t | 9,297 t | 706.44 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 9,379 t | 8,942 t | 437.3 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 9,325 t | 9,061 t | 263.93 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Armenia, at 9,378 t against 9,016 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 362 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 90th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).