Barbados vs Malta: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Barbados
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 60.45 t against 53.26 t in Barbados, a difference of 7.19 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Barbados ranks 186th and Malta ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 95.67 t | 118.97 t | 23.3 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 116.76 t | 134.17 t | 17.41 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 122.96 t | 141.38 t | 18.42 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 126.48 t | 100.53 t | 25.95 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 103.51 t | 68.78 t | 34.73 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 65.37 t | 70.3 t | 4.93 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 53.16 t | 60.95 t | 7.79 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Barbados or Malta?
- Malta, at 60.45 t against 53.26 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Barbados and Malta?
- 7.19 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Barbados ranks 186th and Malta ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).