Belarus vs Japan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Japan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 39,354 t against 38,206 t in Japan, a difference of 1,148 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 50th and Japan ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,633 t | 37,799 t | 12,834 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 41,253 t | 38,715 t | 2,538 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 39,170 t | 38,756 t | 413.56 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 39,423 t | 38,760 t | 663.5 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Japan?
- Belarus, at 39,354 t against 38,206 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Japan?
- 1,148 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Japan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Japan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 50th and Japan ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).