Belarus vs Philippines: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 42,934 t against 39,354 t in Belarus, a difference of 3,580 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,633 t | 24,324 t | 26,309 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 41,253 t | 29,131 t | 12,122 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 39,170 t | 38,510 t | 660.11 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 39,423 t | 39,523 t | 100.3 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 42,934 t against 39,354 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Philippines?
- 3,580 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Philippines rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 47th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).