Belgium vs Sweden: Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 9,289 t against 9,089 t in Belgium, a difference of 200 t.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 103rd and Sweden ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,110 t | 9,935 t | 1,825 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 8,272 t | 9,421 t | 1,150 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 9,061 t | 9,312 t | 251.19 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen, Belgium or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 9,289 t against 9,089 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen between Belgium and Sweden?
- 200 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Sweden rank globally for atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium ranks 103rd and Sweden ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).