Bhutan vs Mauritius: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bhutan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 851.24 t against 487.08 t in Mauritius, a difference of 364.16 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.7 times Mauritius's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 142nd and Mauritius ranks 145th of 186 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 481.75 t | 335.44 t | 146.32 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 653.56 t | 441.86 t | 211.71 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 1,114 t | 513.51 t | 600.34 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 1,420 t | 554.55 t | 865.64 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 1,674 t | 521.13 t | 1,153 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 1,242 t | 482.57 t | 759.26 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 910.49 t | 485.76 t | 424.73 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Bhutan or Mauritius?
- Bhutan, at 851.24 t against 487.08 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Bhutan and Mauritius?
- 364.16 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Mauritius rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Bhutan ranks 142nd and Mauritius ranks 145th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).