Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sweden: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 9,289 t against 9,016 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 273 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Sweden ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,143 t | 12,907 t | 4,764 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 9,297 t | 9,935 t | 638.23 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 8,942 t | 9,421 t | 479.27 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 9,061 t | 9,312 t | 251.5 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 9,289 t against 9,016 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sweden?
- 273 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sweden rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Sweden ranks 91st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).