Brazil vs Russian Federation: Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Brazil
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 579,159 t against 537,887 t in Brazil, a difference of 41,272 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Brazil ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 185 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 401,008 t | 792,091 t | 391,082 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 478,667 t | 594,254 t | 115,587 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 530,959 t | 551,139 t | 20,180 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 537,545 t | 576,010 t | 38,466 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen, Brazil or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 579,159 t against 537,887 t in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen between Brazil and Russian Federation?
- 41,272 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Russian Federation rank globally for atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen?
- Brazil ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).