Cameroon vs Romania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cameroon
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 62,127 t against 58,753 t in Cameroon, a difference of 3,374 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 40th and Romania ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,529 t | 133,723 t | 105,194 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 37,826 t | 150,857 t | 113,031 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 49,914 t | 184,389 t | 134,475 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 54,029 t | 106,862 t | 52,832 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 54,082 t | 73,088 t | 19,005 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 57,734 t | 66,283 t | 8,549 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 58,661 t | 63,302 t | 4,641 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Cameroon or Romania?
- Romania, at 62,127 t against 58,753 t in Cameroon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Cameroon and Romania?
- 3,374 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Romania rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Cameroon ranks 40th and Romania ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).