Canada vs Myanmar: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Canada
- Myanmar
How they compare
Canada currently reports 175,669 t against 120,408 t in Myanmar, a difference of 55,261 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.5 times Myanmar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 17th and Myanmar ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 132,697 t | 44,431 t | 88,266 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 171,722 t | 52,155 t | 119,567 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 196,555 t | 57,188 t | 139,367 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 203,814 t | 63,382 t | 140,432 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 182,977 t | 75,577 t | 107,400 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 172,411 t | 101,508 t | 70,903 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 174,206 t | 118,174 t | 56,032 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Canada or Myanmar?
- Canada, at 175,669 t against 120,408 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Canada and Myanmar?
- 55,261 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Myanmar rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Canada ranks 17th and Myanmar ranks 20th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).