Caribbean vs Czechoslovakia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Caribbean
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 62,953 t against 31,377 t in Caribbean, a difference of 31,576 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 2.0 times Caribbean's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 28th and Czechoslovakia ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,342 t | 61,897 t | 44,556 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 24,085 t | 74,422 t | 50,337 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 25,549 t | 76,057 t | 50,508 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 26,634 t | 67,858 t | 41,224 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Caribbean or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 62,953 t against 31,377 t in Caribbean as of 1992.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Caribbean and Czechoslovakia?
- 31,576 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Caribbean and Czechoslovakia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Caribbean ranks 28th and Czechoslovakia ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).