Caribbean vs Mozambique: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Caribbean
- Mozambique
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 31,377 t against 30,221 t in Mozambique, a difference of 1,156 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 58th and Mozambique ranks 61st of 201 groups.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,342 t | 4,731 t | 12,610 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 24,085 t | 5,461 t | 18,624 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 25,549 t | 6,830 t | 18,719 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 29,404 t | 13,803 t | 15,602 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 33,524 t | 23,751 t | 9,773 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 32,567 t | 29,637 t | 2,931 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 31,346 t | 30,073 t | 1,273 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Caribbean or Mozambique?
- Caribbean, at 31,377 t against 30,221 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Caribbean and Mozambique?
- 1,156 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Mozambique rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Caribbean ranks 58th and Mozambique ranks 61st of 201 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).