Central America vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central America
- Sudan
How they compare
Central America currently reports 151,133 t against 102,206 t in Sudan, a difference of 48,927 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 1.5 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 38 regions.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 160,994 t | 99,077 t | 61,917 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 154,617 t | 102,274 t | 52,343 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Central America or Sudan?
- Central America, at 151,133 t against 102,206 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Central America and Sudan?
- 48,927 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Central America ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).