Central Asia vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central Asia
- Sudan
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 113,030 t against 102,206 t in Sudan, a difference of 10,824 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 38 regions.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 117,576 t | 99,077 t | 18,499 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 114,101 t | 102,274 t | 11,828 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Central Asia or Sudan?
- Central Asia, at 113,030 t against 102,206 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Central Asia and Sudan?
- 10,824 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Central Asia ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).