Chile vs Panama: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 3,505 t against 2,780 t in Chile, a difference of 725 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 132nd and Panama ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,534 t | 586.45 t | 2,947 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 4,287 t | 744.94 t | 3,542 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 4,152 t | 572.65 t | 3,579 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 3,713 t | 1,579 t | 2,134 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 2,791 t | 2,402 t | 388.53 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 2,980 t | 3,175 t | 195.53 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 2,877 t | 3,329 t | 451.83 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 3,505 t against 2,780 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Panama?
- 725 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 132nd and Panama ranks 129th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).