Congo vs Turkmenistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Congo
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 5,192 t against 4,551 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 641 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Congo ranks 120th and Turkmenistan ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,923 t | 3,796 t | 873.16 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 4,001 t | 4,772 t | 770.52 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 4,663 t | 4,970 t | 307.14 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 5,074 t | 4,532 t | 542.18 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Congo or Turkmenistan?
- Congo, at 5,192 t against 4,551 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Congo and Turkmenistan?
- 641 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Turkmenistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Congo ranks 120th and Turkmenistan ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).