Costa Rica vs Estonia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 2,655 t against 2,555 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 100 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 124th and Estonia ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,922 t | 3,331 t | 1,408 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 2,216 t | 2,168 t | 48.76 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 2,595 t | 2,347 t | 247.62 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 2,510 t | 2,606 t | 96.43 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 2,655 t against 2,555 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Estonia?
- 100 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Estonia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 124th and Estonia ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).