Côte d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Uganda
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 83,616 t against 82,461 t in Uganda, a difference of 1,155 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 26th of 29 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,600 t | 24,184 t | 13,585 t | Uganda |
| 1970s | 15,632 t | 31,368 t | 15,736 t | Uganda |
| 1980s | 24,235 t | 45,238 t | 21,003 t | Uganda |
| 1990s | 35,710 t | 65,690 t | 29,979 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 41,350 t | 70,670 t | 29,320 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 61,952 t | 84,192 t | 22,240 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 82,759 t | 82,449 t | 310.1 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Côte d'Ivoire or Uganda?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 83,616 t against 82,461 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda?
- 1,155 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 26th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).