Cuba vs Guatemala: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 15,191 t against 14,510 t in Cuba, a difference of 681 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Cuba ranks 84th and Guatemala ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,547 t | 4,838 t | 1,292 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 7,959 t | 6,162 t | 1,796 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 8,704 t | 8,126 t | 578.35 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 11,987 t | 11,610 t | 376.69 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 15,890 t | 14,865 t | 1,025 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 14,335 t | 15,024 t | 688.43 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 14,523 t | 15,573 t | 1,051 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 15,191 t against 14,510 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Guatemala?
- 681 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 84th and Guatemala ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).