Cuba vs Lithuania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 14,510 t against 13,889 t in Lithuania, a difference of 621 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Cuba ranks 84th and Lithuania ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,607 t | 19,179 t | 6,572 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 15,890 t | 11,796 t | 4,094 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 14,335 t | 13,517 t | 818.05 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 14,523 t | 13,840 t | 683.02 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Lithuania?
- Cuba, at 14,510 t against 13,889 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Lithuania?
- 621 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Lithuania rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 84th and Lithuania ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).