Czechia vs Tunisia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 27,855 t against 26,103 t in Tunisia, a difference of 1,752 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 65th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41,696 t | 23,892 t | 17,804 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 35,829 t | 25,905 t | 9,924 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 30,110 t | 26,341 t | 3,769 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 28,039 t | 26,099 t | 1,940 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Tunisia?
- Czechia, at 27,855 t against 26,103 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Tunisia?
- 1,752 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Tunisia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Tunisia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 65th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).