Czechoslovakia vs Niger: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 75,218 t against 62,953 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 12,265 t.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 30th and Niger ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 61,897 t | 24,378 t | 37,520 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 74,422 t | 25,768 t | 48,654 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 76,057 t | 30,031 t | 46,026 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 67,858 t | 41,574 t | 26,284 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Niger?
- Niger, at 75,218 t against 62,953 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Niger?
- 12,265 t, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Niger?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Niger rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 30th and Niger ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).