Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Sudan
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 104,610 t against 102,206 t in Sudan, a difference of 2,404 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 18 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 86,857 t | 99,077 t | 12,220 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 101,068 t | 102,274 t | 1,205 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Sudan?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 104,610 t against 102,206 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan?
- 2,404 t, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).