Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen

Democratic Republic of the Congo
104,610 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
74,207 t
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 104,610 t against 74,207 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 30,403 t.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 24,649 t 19,314 t 5,335 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 30,934 t 25,392 t 5,543 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 37,357 t 34,198 t 3,159 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 43,775 t 43,580 t 195.71 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 44,277 t 53,137 t 8,861 t United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 82,496 t 69,166 t 13,330 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 101,068 t 74,154 t 26,915 t Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 104,610 t against 74,207 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
30,403 t, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/atmospheric-deposition-cropland-nitrogen/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/atmospheric-deposition-cropland-nitrogen/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).