Dominican Republic vs Finland: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 5,439 t against 5,405 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 34 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 106th and Finland ranks 105th of 186 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,608 t | 8,430 t | 5,822 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 3,740 t | 9,823 t | 6,083 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 4,664 t | 9,376 t | 4,712 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 4,865 t | 6,513 t | 1,648 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 5,308 t | 5,470 t | 162.09 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 5,177 t | 5,461 t | 284.12 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 5,397 t | 5,423 t | 25.64 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Finland?
- Finland, at 5,439 t against 5,405 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Finland?
- 34 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Finland rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 106th and Finland ranks 105th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).