Ecuador vs Peru: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 13,497 t against 13,176 t in Ecuador, a difference of 321 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 93rd and Peru ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,254 t | 3,031 t | 3,222 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 7,224 t | 4,615 t | 2,610 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 9,252 t | 6,159 t | 3,093 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 13,395 t | 8,126 t | 5,268 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 14,019 t | 10,644 t | 3,376 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 13,752 t | 11,751 t | 2,001 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 13,456 t | 13,685 t | 229.32 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Peru?
- Peru, at 13,497 t against 13,176 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Peru?
- 321 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 93rd and Peru ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).