Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 13,176 t against 11,573 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 1,603 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 83rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 84th of 185 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,254 t | 1,168 t | 5,085 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 7,224 t | 2,183 t | 5,041 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 9,252 t | 5,256 t | 3,995 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 13,395 t | 8,907 t | 4,487 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 14,019 t | 10,074 t | 3,946 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 13,752 t | 11,751 t | 2,001 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 13,456 t | 11,298 t | 2,158 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Saudi Arabia?
- Ecuador, at 13,176 t against 11,573 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
- 1,603 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Saudi Arabia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 83rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 84th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).