Estonia vs North Macedonia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 2,975 t against 2,655 t in Estonia, a difference of 320 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 185 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,331 t | 4,159 t | 828.47 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 2,168 t | 3,344 t | 1,177 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 2,347 t | 2,937 t | 589.98 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 2,606 t | 2,980 t | 373.84 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 2,975 t against 2,655 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 320 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and North Macedonia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).