Eswatini vs New Zealand: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1,735 t against 1,603 t in Eswatini, a difference of 132 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
Eswatini ranks 133rd and New Zealand ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 622.86 t | 568.87 t | 53.99 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 969.09 t | 728.67 t | 240.42 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 1,235 t | 732.79 t | 502.3 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1,481 t | 913.35 t | 567.98 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,557 t | 1,202 t | 354.43 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,463 t | 1,685 t | 221.55 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1,594 t | 1,766 t | 171.12 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1,735 t against 1,603 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and New Zealand?
- 132 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and New Zealand rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 133rd and New Zealand ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).